Tech News, Magazine & Review WordPress Theme 2017
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Supply Chain Updates

Complete vaginal-mesh removals ‘leaving material behind’

usscmc by usscmc
February 6, 2020
Complete vaginal-mesh removals ‘leaving material behind’
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Reporter holding up a surgical mesh

Image caption

The mesh implants are used to ease incontinence and support organs

Dozens of women who thought they were having a “complete mesh removal” have discovered material has been left behind, the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire programme has been told.

Some women have been left unable to walk, work or have sex after having the initial vaginal-mesh implants.

Specialist surgeons say in some cases total or partial mesh removal can be beneficial.

But some women said their symptoms had become worse. One was left suicidal.

Vaginal-mesh implants remain available on the NHS in England but only when certain conditions are met. In Scotland, the use of mesh was halted in 2018.

‘Chronic pain’

“Leila”, not her real name, said her surgeon had promised her a “full mesh removal” – but she has now been told more than 10cm (4in) could have been left behind.

She had mesh implanted several years ago to treat urinary incontinence and said she had woken after the surgery with “chronic pain in my legs, my groin and my hips”.

It is believed she suffered nerve damage.

A year later – after being told by one expert a mesh removal would be unlikely to resolve her pain – she found a surgeon who told her the implant could be completely removed.

‘Family rejoiced’

“The first question I asked was, ‘Can this mesh be removed fully?’ and I was assured it was possible,” she said.

She had two operations – each taking her half a year to recover from – and was told there had been a full removal.

“Me and my family rejoiced, thinking that chapter of several years of my life was going to be over,” she said.

But “within a few months” the pain began to return and her health deteriorated.

‘Upside down’

She sought a scan and said she could not describe the “horror” of being told only 5-8cm had been removed.

“My whole world turned upside down,” she said, breaking into tears.

She has since been told by a separate specialist her form of mesh was one of the most difficult to remove and could cause significant nerve damage if not removed properly.

She said she had never been told this by her surgeon.

Image caption

The mesh is made of a polypropylene, a type of plastic

The number of women affected is unknown but the Victoria Derbyshire programme understands there are at least dozens of such cases.

Over 20 years, more than 100,000 women across the UK have had transvaginal mesh implants to treat organ prolapse and incontinence – often after childbirth.

Mesh removal is extremely complicated. One surgeon has compared the removal of an implant from the pelvis to removing hair from chewing gum.

There can also be some confusion over terminology.

‘Surgeon’s responsibility’

Baroness Cumberledge, who is leading a governmental review into vaginal mesh, said in some instances, for example, a partial removal was referred to by surgical teams as a “full vaginal removal”.

And, she told BBC News, it was “the surgeon’s responsibility” to ensure the patient was clear what the surgery entailed.

Now, Labour MSP Neil Findlay has written to Scotland’s First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, calling on her to ask the General Medical Council to investigate.

He told BBC News he had seen evidence of several instances in which women had been told by surgeons they would receive a “full” or “complete” removal, but where material had been left behind.

‘Brick wall’

Another woman, “Fiona”, said she had been left suicidal after her complications had reappeared following her mesh-removal surgery, for which she had paid £12,000.

The issue, she said, had been exacerbated by a letter sent from her surgeon to her GP, saying a complete removal had taken place.

This had meant when she had asked to be referred to a specialist, she had hit a “brick wall” and could get a second opinion by self-referring only.

When she did, she was told some of the implant remained.

“You feel betrayed all over again,” she said.

‘Best decision’

Surgeons say most of the fee to receive private care for mesh removal comes from hospital costs.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said in a statement that it took “each and every complication caused by mesh very seriously”.

It said: “Management of symptoms will depend on the complication and total or partial removal of the mesh may be recommended in some circumstances.

“Whereas for other women, mesh removal may not be the solution to the problem.

“Women must be informed of all options available and the benefits and risks of each so they can make the best decision about their care.”

Follow the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire programme on Facebook and Twitter – and see more of our stories here.

usscmc

usscmc

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • How Hapag Lloyd captured a major market share in the Container Shipping Industry in USA
  • Why USA’s East Coast is the Favorite Destination for Manufacturing Companies
  • How Trade Relations Between the USA and UK Improved After Keir Starmer Became Prime Minister
  • Tips and Tricks for Procurement Managers to Handle Their Supplier Woes
  • The Crazy Supply Chain of Walmart Spanning Across the Globe

Recent Comments

  • Top 5 Supply Chain Certifications that are in high demand | Top 5 Certifications on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications
  • 3 Best Procurement Certifications that are most valuable | Procurement Newz on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications

Archives

  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019

Categories

  • Global News
  • Supply Chain Updates

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Antispam
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 www.usscmc.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us

© 2025 www.usscmc.com