Tech News, Magazine & Review WordPress Theme 2017
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Supply Chain Updates

Boeing faces $3.9 million FAA penalty for supply chain fumble

usscmc by usscmc
December 7, 2019
Boeing faces $3.9 million FAA penalty for supply chain fumble
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Boeing Co. (NYSE: BA) can’t seem to catch a break.

On Friday (Dec. 6), the Federal Aviation Administration said it intends to issue a $3.9 million fine against the aircraft manufacturer for installing substandard components on about 133 narrowbody 737 jetliners that posed a safety risk.

It’s the latest in a series of embarrassments for the Chicago manufacturer related to production, safety and government contracting.

The FAA alleged Boeing failed to adequately oversee suppliers to ensure they complied with the company’s quality assurance system. The agency contends the failure resulted in the installation of slat tracks that were weakened later during the metal-coating process.

Slat tracks are located on the leading edge of the wings and are used to guide the movement of panels known as slats. The panels provide additional lift during takeoff and landing. The FAA alleges Boeing knowingly submitted aircraft for final FAA airworthiness certification after determining that the parts could not be used after failing a strength test.

The agency stated that the affected slat tracks were processed by Southwest United Industries (SUI), a third-tier supplier to Boeing, in June 2018. SUI subsequently shipped the parts to Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., which then delivered the parts to Boeing.

The FAA also alleged that SUI notified Kencoa Aerospace, LLC, within a week that a batch of the slat tracks had failed a quality test, and likely were brittle. Kencoa subsequently passed that information to Spirit, which notified Boeing in September and proposed that Boeing accept the parts as delivered. 

Boeing rejected the proposal, but still certified 133 aircraft through May 2, 2019, as airworthy..

In June, the FAA ordered the affected aircraft be inspected after Boeing issued a service bulletin. 

The FAA alleged that identification of the defective parts was hindered because SUI did not apply a protective coating over the part identification mark that is required to be displayed on the slat tracks. As a result, those part identification marks became either obscured or invisible, making it difficult to identify the affected parts.

The FAA said Boeing’s quality control system should ensure suppliers adhere to FAA regulations..

Boeing has 30 days to respond to the FAA’s letter proposing the civil penalty.

737 MAX Update

Boeing’s biggest headache at the moment is the 737 MAX.

The grounding of the 737 MAX since March after two deadly crashes has hurt Boeing’s bottom line. Third quarter revenues plunged 41% and operating margin was in the red because of the inability to deliver the next-generation 737 planes. The ongoing production slowdown to cost the Chicago-headquartered company nearly $1 billion, not including hundreds of millions of dollars in potential compensation to airlines for lost MAX availability. Boeing has also settled about half of the lawsuits filed in federal court over the crash of the plane by Indonesia’s Lion Air.

Boeing has been working for almost a year to adjust the MAX’s flight control software, which investigations have blamed for aggressively pushing down the planes’ nose in response to faulty stall signals, causing the crashes. In the fall, it overhauled its organizational structure to prioritize safety at every step and stripped CEO Dennis Muilenburg of his dual role as chairman.

The company has pushed back to January its estimate for when the FAA will approve the MAX for return to commercial service. The aircraft maker still needs to complete a software audit, schedule a key certification flight test and get pilot-training material certified.

Boeing is still producing MAX planes, but at a slower rate and can’t deliver them until the no-fly order is lifted. FAA Administrator Stephen Dickson, who is scheduled to testify about the agency’s review of the MAX before the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee next week (Dec. 11), said last month that the agency will handle the certification of the roughly 300 MAX jets built since the grounding, rather than letting Boeing self-certify the planes.

“The FAA’s return-to-service decision for the MAX will be based solely on our assessment of the sufficiency of Boeing’s proposed software updates and pilot training that addresses the known issues for grounding the aircraft,” Dickson said in a speech before the Washington Aero Club. “We are not delegating anything. When we finally take the decision to return this aircraft to service, it will be the most scrutinized aircraft in history. It will also be one of the safest machines to ever take to the sky. I am not going to sign off on this aircraft until I fly it myself and am satisfied that I would put my own family on it without a second thought.”

Despite the uncertainty, Boeing on Nov. 22 unveiled the MAX 10, the largest MAX variant with up to 230 seats, at its plant in Renton, Wash. The new version has more than 500 orders and commitments from more than 20 airlines, according to Boeing.

Boeing experienced a long order drought on the MAX, but last month Turkey’s SunExpress announced plans to buy 10 more MAX jets and Kazakhstan flag carrier Air Astana said it would buy 30 of the planes.

The aerospace manufacturer last week lost a big order to Airbus, which will supply United Airlines (NASDAQ: UAL) with 50 A321 extra-long range narrowbody jets. United officials had been considering the 737 MAX and the 787 as replacements for its aging Boeing 757-200s, but the MAX crisis appears to have contributed to the decision to go with the European plane maker.

Meanwhile, Boeing also faces production delays for its new model 777X, primarily due to problems with General Electric Co.’s (NYSE: GE) engines. Boeing also experienced a structural failure during a ground-based test. GE says it is redesigning a part that was wearing out faster than expected.  

And Boeing is offering fixes for structural cracks found in 38 older 737NG planes in the U.S. this year. 

If that wasn’t enough, NASA’s inspector general recently reported that Boeing took advantage of program delays for a new manned spacecraft to supply the International Space Station to coax $287 million more from the space agency.

usscmc

usscmc

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • How Hapag Lloyd captured a major market share in the Container Shipping Industry in USA
  • Why USA’s East Coast is the Favorite Destination for Manufacturing Companies
  • How Trade Relations Between the USA and UK Improved After Keir Starmer Became Prime Minister
  • Tips and Tricks for Procurement Managers to Handle Their Supplier Woes
  • The Crazy Supply Chain of Walmart Spanning Across the Globe

Recent Comments

  • Top 5 Supply Chain Certifications that are in high demand | Top 5 Certifications on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications
  • 3 Best Procurement Certifications that are most valuable | Procurement Newz on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications

Archives

  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019

Categories

  • Global News
  • Supply Chain Updates

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Antispam
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 www.usscmc.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us

© 2025 www.usscmc.com