Tech News, Magazine & Review WordPress Theme 2017
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Supply Chain Updates

Top OSHA fines of Q4 2020 include citations for 4 deaths

usscmc by usscmc
January 27, 2021
Top OSHA fines of Q4 2020 include citations for 4 deaths
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In the fourth quarter of 2020 as in many other quarters, fall protection safety standards have a prominent place on the list of top OSHA violations. However, there were also four deaths, as well as violations for failure to protect employees from chemicals commonly associated with painting work, improper management of suspended loads and more related to hoisting and rigging.

Here are the nine violations for the quarter with fines exceeding $120,000, ranked by fine amount:

1. Fabcon Precast LLC – Grove City, Ohio

Total Proposed Fines: $451,079

Status: Violations Under Contest

Fabcon Precast LLC, a manufacturer of precast concrete panels, had the highest proposed fine in Construction Dive’s OSHA roundup for the fourth quarter of 2020.

The $451,079 in proposed initial OSHA fines, representing 10 serious and five willful violation citations, are a result of a worker death at Fabcon’s Grove City, Ohio, facility on June 11. Prior to the accident, the worker, according to OSHA, was removing a jam from under an open pneumatic concrete mixer discharge door. Once he released the jam, the door slammed shut on his head and neck, causing fatal, crushing injuries.

Included in the citations are alleged violations of:

  • OSHA’s General Duty Clause Section 5(a)(1).
  • Confined-space permit requirements.
  • Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout).
  • Training.

Fabcon is contesting the violations.

2. Fortune Painting dba Fortune Restoration Painting & Masonry – Lincolnwood, Illinois

Total Proposed Fines: $299,825

Status: Violations Under Contest (here and here)

After a planned inspection at a Fortune jobsite in Chicago, OSHA inspectors determined that the company allowed unsafe exposure to methylene chloride (paint thinner/stripper) and violated lead safety and cadmium standards.

OSHA proposed total fines of $299,825 for Fortune, which the agency cited for similar violations in 2014, and issued the company citations for six serious and 11 willful violations. Fortune is contesting the violations.

3. Mike Krueger dba Altogether Roofing – Martin, Ohio

Proposed Total Fines: $237,490

Status: Pending Abatement of Violations, Pending Penalty Payment

OSHA investigated one of Mike Krueger’s jobsites in Monclova Township, Ohio, in June and found that the roofing contractor violated general safety and health provisions of Standard 1926 and failed to provide adequate fall protection and fall protection training. The agency cited Krueger with three willful violations and fined him $237,490.

In October 2019, OSHA fined Altogether Roofing $247,544 for fall hazards. Those have been referred to debt collection, according to the agency (here and here).

4. Cracon Inc. – Houston, Texas

Total Proposed Fines: $224,382

Status: Pending Abatement of Violations, Penalty Payment Plan

In April, OSHA said that a Cracon employee and a coworker employed by a different contractor were installing a sewer pipeline for a commercial construction project. The Cracon employee entered the excavation to connect PVC pipe to the steel connector of the horizontal drill system when the pipe began to rotate violently, according to OSHA, as the coworker operated the drilling equipment.

The Cracon worker sustained fatal abdominal injuries after he was caught between the PVC pipe and the trench box and died after transport to the hospital.

OSHA proposed an initial fine of $224,382 for Cracon and cited the company with three serious and two willful violations related to general safety, protective system requirements for excavations and other excavation regulations. However, during an informal settlement, Cracon was able to negotiate a total fine of $90,000, as well as the removal of one serious and one willful violation.

5. Thomas Builders of Virginia – Forest, Virginia

Total Proposed Fines: $193,100

Status: Pending Abatement of Violations

In May, Virginia OSH, under an OSHA-approved state plan, investigated one of Thomas Builders’ jobsites with an emphasis on scaffold safety and fall protection. The agency ended up issuing Thomas citations encompassing 12 violations — two willful and 10 serious.

Virginia OSHA said that Thomas violated the requirements that:

  • Someone qualified to render first aid be on site.
  • Employees wear protective head, eye and face protection.
  • There be a competent person on site to oversee the setup and dismantling of scaffold.
  • Employers use adequate fall protection systems to protect employees and train employees to use them.
  • Employers ensure safe operation of extensible and articulating boom platforms.

6. Alva Interiors – Waterbury, Connecticut

Total Proposed Fines: $141,686

Status: Pending Abatement of Violations, Penalty Payment Plan in Place

In May 2020, OSHA investigators responded to one of Alva Interiors’ jobsites after one of its employees was killed by a steel truss when it collapsed and struck his head while he was cutting steel support pieces.

OSHA cited Alva for one willful and five serious violations and proposed total fines of $141,686. Alva’s violations included those related to hoisting and rigging, training, site-specific erection plans and structural steel assembly.

Through an informal settlement, Alva was able to negotiate its fine down to $75,000.

7. Industrial Insulation and Coatings – Girard, Ohio

Total Proposed Fines: $140,335

Status: Pending Penalty Payment

OSHA began its June investigation into Industrial Insulation and Coatings after three employees fell 40 feet from a roof while installing metal sheeting for a commercial project. One employee slipped and fell into two others, resulting in the death of one and the hospitalization of the remaining two.

After its investigation, which was focused on fall safety, OSHA cited the company for one serious and one willful violation and fined it $140,335. The serious violation fell under regulations regarding material handling equipment and for failure to secure a platform firmly to a lifting carriage and/or forks. The willful violation was for failure to provide adequate fall protection.

8. Riedman Cos. – Rochester, New York

Total Proposed Fines: $138,792

Status: Violations Under Contest

After an investigation of a Riedman jobsite in Corning, New York, the agency cited the company for one willful and two serious violations and proposed total fines of $138,792. Riedman has contested the violations.

OSHA alleged that Riedman failed to properly dispose of waste material from heights of 20 feet or more by using an enclosed chute; did not install a handrail for certain stairways as required; and did not protect employees working at heights of 6 feet or higher from falls with a guardrail system, safety net system or personal fall arrest system.

9. DJB Building & Construction – Glastonbury, Connecticut

Total Proposed Fines: $122,794

Status: Pending Abatement of Violations, Penalty Payment Plan in Place

OSHA’s inspection emphasis was on cranes when it visited a DJB jobsite in Rocky Hill, Connecticut, in May.

The agency ended up citing the contractor with one willful and three serious violations for site layout, planning and sequencing infractions; not configuring routes so that no one is working below a suspended load; and failing to abide by safety regulations for those that find themselves working under a suspended load.

DJB was able to negotiate the penalty down to $80,000.

usscmc

usscmc

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • How Hapag Lloyd captured a major market share in the Container Shipping Industry in USA
  • Why USA’s East Coast is the Favorite Destination for Manufacturing Companies
  • How Trade Relations Between the USA and UK Improved After Keir Starmer Became Prime Minister
  • Tips and Tricks for Procurement Managers to Handle Their Supplier Woes
  • The Crazy Supply Chain of Walmart Spanning Across the Globe

Recent Comments

  • Top 5 Supply Chain Certifications that are in high demand | Top 5 Certifications on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications
  • 3 Best Procurement Certifications that are most valuable | Procurement Newz on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications

Archives

  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019

Categories

  • Global News
  • Supply Chain Updates

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Antispam
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 www.usscmc.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us

© 2025 www.usscmc.com