Tech News, Magazine & Review WordPress Theme 2017
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Supply Chain Updates

Another Maersk ship sailing for LA loses containers

usscmc by usscmc
February 18, 2021
Another Maersk ship sailing for LA loses containers
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A.P. Møller – Maersk has confirmed yet another midocean loss of containers.

A Maersk spokesman told American Shipper that while en route from Xiamen, China, to Los Angeles on Wednesday, the Maersk Eindhoven “experienced an engine stop in heavy seas near Japan during her crossing, resulting in the loss of a number of containers overboard.”

Maersk did not provide an approximate number of containers lost, only saying that “a detailed cargo assessment is ongoing.” 

The Eindhoven is deployed on Maersk’s TP6 Asia-U.S. West Coast service.

Henry Byers, FreightWaves’ maritime market analyst, said, “If Xiamen was the last port of call in China on this service, then the containers from that port are most likely the ones that fell off since they were likely on top of the stack. So of all the importers, Adidas and IKEA were the most likely to lose cargo based on the amount of volume they likely had on board.”

Byers explained, “Since many U.S. importers with larger volumes utilize service contracts directly with Maersk and MSC, members of the 2M Alliance, by looking into the last three vessels that performed this service routing, FreightWaves has insight into which importers were most likely to have freight on board the Maersk Eindhoven.

“In examining the ocean bills of lading registered with U.S. Customs that arrived on the Maersk Eindhoven the last time it called the Port of Los Angeles in October of 2020 via the TP6 Asia-U.S. service, FreightWaves was able to determine that the largest volume named importers on the ship at that time were IKEA, Amazon, Adidas, Williams-Sonoma, Grainger, Wolverine World Wide, Puma and Hasbro,” Byers said. 

Byers said that suggests the bulk of commodities on board the Eindhoven consist of furniture, apparel, electronics, cookware and toys. 

He said according to FreightWaves data, the non-vessel-operating common carriers (NVOCCs) with the largest volumes on the Eindhoven when it called LA in October were DHL Global Forwarding, C.H. Robinson, D.B. Schenker, Hecny Transportation, Topocean Consolidation Service, Damco, Kuehne + Nagel, and De Well Container Shipping. 

The Maersk spokesman said Wednesday the Eindhoven “has restored propulsion and is expected to call the nearest port in Asia capable of dealing with the situation. The relevant authorities have been notified.”

That port was not identified, but available data suggests the container ship may have turned for a Japanese port. The Eindhoven had been due to arrive at the Port of LA on March 1. 

“We view this as a serious situation, which will be investigated promptly and thoroughly,” the spokesman said. “Operations and vessel safety are our highest priority and we will be taking any necessary steps to minimize the risk of similar incidents occurring in the future. A customer communications plan and claims process were urgently put in place for those customers impacted.”

The Eindhoven has a capacity of 13,100 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) and sails under the Danish flag. 

Only last month another Maersk container ship, the Essen, lost 750 containers while sailing on the same service as the Eindhoven — the TP6 from Xiamen to the Port of LA. Heavy seas in the North Pacific were blamed in the Jan. 16 incident. 

Because of port congestion in LA and Long Beach, California, the Maersk Essen changed course and sailed for the Port of Lazaro Cardenas in Mexico, where it arrived for damage assessment and an accident investigation in late January. 

According to MarineTraffic, the Essen remains in Lazaro Cardenas. 

The loss of containers from the Maersk Eindhoven brings the number of reported cases since just Nov. 30 to six. Even without the loss from the Eindhoven factored in, more than 2,675 containers were lost at sea in basically a two-month period. That’s more than double the annual average calculated by the World Shipping Council. 

The MSC Aries lost 41 containers — reportedly all empties — in the North Pacific while sailing for Long Beach on Jan. 29. The at-sea accident was attributed to “heavy weather.”

In one of the worst cases of cargo losses on record, the ONE Apus lost 1,816 containers about 1,600 nautical miles northwest of Hawaii after reportedly sailing into a severe storm Nov. 30 while en route to the Port of Long Beach.

Taiwanese carrier Evergreen Marine’s Ever Liberal lost a reported 36 containers after encountering strong winds in the Pacific about 20 nautical miles off the coast of Kyushu, Japan, on Dec. 31. An additional 21 containers reportedly fell onto the deck. 

Israeli carrier ZIM reportedly lost 76 containers from the chartered ship E.R. Tianping in January. That incident also occurred in the Pacific as the container ship was making its way from South Korea to North America.

Ocean container losses topple annual average in 2 months

Maersk Essen loses 750 containers, sails for Mexico

ONE Apus lost or damaged containers ‘could exceed 1,900’

Click here for more American Shipper/FreightWaves stories by Senior Editor Kim Link-Wills.

usscmc

usscmc

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • How Hapag Lloyd captured a major market share in the Container Shipping Industry in USA
  • Why USA’s East Coast is the Favorite Destination for Manufacturing Companies
  • How Trade Relations Between the USA and UK Improved After Keir Starmer Became Prime Minister
  • Tips and Tricks for Procurement Managers to Handle Their Supplier Woes
  • The Crazy Supply Chain of Walmart Spanning Across the Globe

Recent Comments

  • Top 5 Supply Chain Certifications that are in high demand | Top 5 Certifications on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications
  • 3 Best Procurement Certifications that are most valuable | Procurement Newz on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications

Archives

  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019

Categories

  • Global News
  • Supply Chain Updates

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Antispam
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 www.usscmc.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us

© 2025 www.usscmc.com