Tech News, Magazine & Review WordPress Theme 2017
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Supply Chain Updates

Study Finds Women At The Top Experience More Sexual Harassment

usscmc by usscmc
January 16, 2020
Study Finds Women At The Top Experience More Sexual Harassment
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Boss is harassing business woman while working, sexual harassment at work.

Getty

Sexual harassment is historically understood as being more about power than about sex. Most of the #MeToo cases that have made the news follow a power dynamic that fits this model of understanding: a man who’s higher up in the organizational hierarchy wielding their power in an inappropriate manner over a woman who either directly or indirectly works under that man. 

According to a new study, when the roles are reversed, and women are in that place of power, they aren’t actually less likely to experience sexual harassment—they might even be more vulnerable to it. This is according to the findings of the Swedish Institute for Social Research at Stockholm University, which surveyed workers in the United States, Japan and Sweden. 

While it’s true that social and gender norms vary across these three countries, the findings of the survey were fairly universal: women in supervisory positions were more likely to experience sexual harassment in the workplace—anywhere from 30 to nearly 100% more likely. That likeliness went up across the board when subordinates were mostly men. 

Sweden’s data came from the Swedish Work Environment Survey, a nationally representative dataset collected biannually by Statistics Sweden. Five waves of data sets were used: 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2007. In each, a definition of sexual harassment was offered and the respondents were presented the subjective question—accompanied by some examples—of whether or not they had been sexually harassed in the last twelve months. 

In the U.S. and Japan, the research team collected new survey material. The same definition of sexual harassment was offered, but researchers used two different methods to assess exposure to sexual harassment. The first method, the list-based survey, presented respondents with a list of twenty-three types of behaviors asking, “In the past 12 months, have you ever been in a work situation where one or more individuals [behaved in this way]?” The second subjective survey simply asked respondents if they were sexually harassed in the last twelve months. The two measurement types were used as studies have found that subjective questions tend to generate lower reported rates of sexual harassment as respondents fail to define less severe or less frequent incidents at work as sexual harassment.

Among the three countries, the most narrow difference in exposure to sexual harassment was seen in Sweden where female supervisors reported a 30% higher rate of harassment than employees not in supervisory positions. In the U.S., a 50% higher rate for supervisors was found for the list-based measure and a nearly 100% higher rate for the subjective measure. Similar results were found in Japan where supervisors reported a 30% higher rate using the list-based measure and, again, almost 100% higher for the subjective measure. 

“When we first started to study sexual harassment, we expected a higher exposure for women with less power in the workplace. Instead, we found the contrary. When you think about it, there are logical explanations: a supervisor is exposed to new groups of potential perpetrators. She can be harassed both from her subordinates and from higher-level management within the company. More harassment from these two groups is also what we saw when we asked the women who had harassed them,” said Johanna Rickne, Professor of Economics at the Swedish Institute for Social Research.

That understanding seems to hold up when you dig deeper into the organizational hierarchy data. Women in supervisory levels were found to be more likely to experience sexual harassment at work but that trend line started to taper off again as you looked to women closer to the top where traditionally they would be less likely to work directly with as many different groups on a regular basis. 

So, at least for now, it would seem that there’s a pretty clear paradox of power at play when it comes to sexual harassment of working women. Women climbing the corporate ladder don’t lose the target on their back; in fact, it appears to grow as they climb—only narrowing once they’ve reached the very top. 

usscmc

usscmc

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • How Hapag Lloyd captured a major market share in the Container Shipping Industry in USA
  • Why USA’s East Coast is the Favorite Destination for Manufacturing Companies
  • How Trade Relations Between the USA and UK Improved After Keir Starmer Became Prime Minister
  • Tips and Tricks for Procurement Managers to Handle Their Supplier Woes
  • The Crazy Supply Chain of Walmart Spanning Across the Globe

Recent Comments

  • Top 5 Supply Chain Certifications that are in high demand | Top 5 Certifications on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications
  • 3 Best Procurement Certifications that are most valuable | Procurement Newz on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications

Archives

  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019

Categories

  • Global News
  • Supply Chain Updates

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Antispam
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 www.usscmc.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us

© 2025 www.usscmc.com