Tech News, Magazine & Review WordPress Theme 2017
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Supply Chain Updates

Thousands of tons of contaminated waste dumped on private Villa Hills property

usscmc by usscmc
December 26, 2019
Thousands of tons of contaminated waste dumped on private Villa Hills property
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

VILLA HILLS — On a warm day in October, David and Wendy Bell stood near the edge of their Villa Hills property overlooking the Ohio River and marveled at the view.

“We’re getting old,” Wendy said. “This was going to be our forever place to live for the rest of our lives.”

The Bells wanted to create a small campground and organic garden on their one-acre riverfront lot. They needed thousands of tons of uncontaminated fill dirt and rock to level and stabilize the property.

In 2017, Kokosing Industrial, the contractor for the

Metro Sewer District’s Lick Run sewer project

on Cincinnati’s West Side, offered to deliver and dump the material for free on the Bells’ property.

But instead of getting clean fill dirt that complied with the Bell’s permits and Kentucky state law, Kokosing sent them nearly 2,000 truckloads of contaminated black soil and sand removed from MSD’s Lick Run work site, according to a federal lawsuit the Bells filed in April.

“It pisses me off to no end,” David said. “We had such a good thing here.”

In the lawsuit, the couple names Kokosing, MSD, the city of Cincinnati and two additional contractors for the MSD project — ATC Group Services and Ashcraft Sand & Gravel Company — as defendants.

The city of Cincinnati is responsible for the management and operation of MSD.

In December 2017, state environmental regulators conducted tests on samples of soil removed from the Bells’ property.

Tests showed those soil samples contained levels of certain compounds the Environmental Protection Agency considers excessive for residential property, according to an investigation report by Kentucky’s Division of Waste Management.

The investigation report focused on PAHs, also known as polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Some PAHs have been identified by the EPA as possible human carcinogens, although it’s unclear how much of a health risk the Bells face from the contamination.

Contaminated black sand on Bell's Villa Hills property .png

In January 2018, Kentucky environmental regulators issued a Notice of Violation to Wendy Bell, David Bell, Kokosing and MSD.

The violations were for transporting contaminated soil from the MSD project site, disposing of it on the Bells’ property and placing contaminated soil in the 100-year flood plain.

The violation notices required the Bells, Kokosing and MSD to install a silt fence at the base of the Bells’ property to try to keep the contaminated soil from spreading or getting into the Ohio River, the primary source of drinking water for residents in the Tri-State.

Silt fence on the Bell's property

Craig Cheatham

Silt fence on the Bell’s property

The silt fence is essentially sheets of plastic near the ground stretched across the Bells’ property. Stakes pounded into the soil keep them in place.

According to the Bells’ lawsuit, Kentucky state regulators determined in March 2018 that the contamination on the Bells’ property “posed an imminent threat to human health and the environment.”

The state of Kentucky demanded that the Bells, Kokosing and MSD submit a cleanup plan.

ATC Group Services submitted a Corrective Action Plan for the Bells’ property in June 2019, the lawsuit states.

The state of Kentucky approved the plan, but the Bells objected to it because they say it didn’t require cleaning up all contaminated fill material and restricts how they can use the land after the cleanup.

The Bells’ lawsuit says MSD, the city of Cincinnati and Kokosing knew — or should have known — that the solid waste left by an old metals plant at MSD’s Lick Run work site was contaminated with heavy metals and other potentially harmful compounds and should not have been dumped on their residential property in a floodplain.

Black sand and soil on Bell's property

Kentucky Department for Environmental Quality

Black sand and soil on Bell’s property in December 2017

Each of the defendants deny they are to blame for the contaminated material being dumped on the Bells’ land, although no one disputes the material is contaminated and that it came from the Lick Run site.

In a statement provided to the I-Team, MSD said “Kokosing delivered the material… to the Bell’s property without MSD’s knowledge or authorization.”

MSD added that the Kentucky Department for Environmental Quality approved a cleanup plan for the Bell’s property, but “the Bells are now refusing to allow the cleanup to move forward.”

In a separate statement, Kokosing Industrial blamed MSD’s environmental consultant, ATC Group Services. According to the Bell’s lawsuit, ATC determined the soil wasn’t contaminated.

“Had the material been properly classified by MSD’s consultant as contaminated, it would have been hauled to a licensed landfill and not the Bell’s property,” Kokosing’s statement said.

ATC Group Services is MSD’s environmental consultant on the Lick Run project and, according to the Bell’s lawsuit, “was responsible for identifying and characterizing soil” at Lick Run and to “ensure proper management, handling and disposal of soil.”

Ashcraft Sand & Gravel Company hauled the material to the Bells’ property, then spread it across their lot, according the Bell’s lawsuit.

All of the defendants named in the Bell’s lawsuit — MSD, the city of Cincinnati, Kokosing Industrial, ATC Group Services and Ashcraft Sand & Gravel — filed motions to dismiss the case for various reasons.

U.S. District Judge David Bunning has not ruled on their motions.

ATC Group Services and Ashcraft Sand & Gravel Company did not respond to requests for comment emailed to their attorneys.

In addition to a complete cleanup of the Bells’ property, the couple’s attorney, Jeff Sanders, believes the Bells deserve to be paid damages for the contaminated material dumped on their property and the disruption and stress the ordeal caused them.

“Do the Bells deserve compensation? Absolutely,” Sanders said. “Yes. For what they’ve been put through for the last two years plus.”

“They don’t care,” said Wendy as she and David stood together overlooking the scenic bend in the Ohio River next to their property.

“They have shown no concern. No ‘I’m sorry.’ Nothing.”

usscmc

usscmc

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • How Hapag Lloyd captured a major market share in the Container Shipping Industry in USA
  • Why USA’s East Coast is the Favorite Destination for Manufacturing Companies
  • How Trade Relations Between the USA and UK Improved After Keir Starmer Became Prime Minister
  • Tips and Tricks for Procurement Managers to Handle Their Supplier Woes
  • The Crazy Supply Chain of Walmart Spanning Across the Globe

Recent Comments

  • Top 5 Supply Chain Certifications that are in high demand | Top 5 Certifications on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications
  • 3 Best Procurement Certifications that are most valuable | Procurement Newz on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications

Archives

  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019

Categories

  • Global News
  • Supply Chain Updates

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Antispam
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 www.usscmc.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us

© 2025 www.usscmc.com