Tech News, Magazine & Review WordPress Theme 2017
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Supply Chain Updates

U.S. Housing Supply Reaches New Low

usscmc by usscmc
February 8, 2020
U.S. Housing Supply Reaches New Low
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

  • The nation’s housing supply declined by 13.6 percent year-over-year, and inventory in large markets decreased by 14.1 percent
  • The January national median listing price was $300,000, up 3.4 percent year-over-year
  • Nationally, homes sold in 86 days in January, two days more quickly than last year

SANTA CLARA, Calif. — National housing inventory declined 13.6 percent in January, the steepest year-over-year decrease in more than 4 years, pushing the supply of for sale homes in the U.S. to its lowest level since realtor.com® began tracking the data in 2012, according to the website’s January Monthly Housing Trends Report released February 7th.

Based on realtor.com®‘s analysis, January’s steep year-over-year decline amounted to a national loss of 164,000 listings, tightening the grip of the housing shortage plaguing the U.S. Based on realtor.com® data, it shows no signs of easing in the near future as the volume of newly listed properties also declined by 10.6 percent since last year.

“Homebuyers took advantage of low mortgage rates and stable listing prices to drive sales higher at the end of 2019, further depleting the already limited inventory of homes for sale. With fewer homes coming up for sale, we’ve hit another new low of for sale-listings in January,” according to Danielle Hale, realtor.com®‘s chief economist. “This is a challenging sign for the large numbers of Millennial and Gen Z buyers coming into the housing market this homebuying season as it implies the potential for rising prices and fast-selling homes—a competitive market. In fact, markets such as San Jose in Northern California, which saw inventory down nearly 40 percent last month, are also seeing prices grow by 10 percent while homes are selling at a blistering pace of 51 days.”

The supply shortage is found at every price tier throughout the U.S., but it is especially pronounced at the entry-level. In January, properties priced under $200,000 declined by 19 percent, an acceleration compared to December’s decline of 18.1 percent. The decline in inventory of mid-tier properties priced between $200,000 and $750,000 also accelerated, to a decline of 12 percent year-over-year, compared to December’s 10.2 percent decline. Even upper-tier properties priced at more than $750,000 declined by 5.9 percent year-over-year compared to December’s decline of 4.4 percent.  

As inventory reached its lowest point on record, both listing prices and days on market reacted to the imbalance of supply and demand. The median U.S. listing price grew by 3.4 percent year-over-year, to $299,995 in January, while prices in 18 metros grew by more than 10 percent. Of the 50 largest metros, 46 saw year-over-year gains in median listing prices, with Philadelphia as the nation’s standout with a 16.0 percent increase over last year. Additionally, with the lack of supply, homes are selling in an average of 86 days, two days more quickly than January of last year.

Where Housing Supply Changed the Most
The metros which saw the largest declines in housing inventory were San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif. (-37.3 percent); Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz. (-35.4 percent); and San Diego-Carlsbad, Calif. (-34.0 percent). Other markets across the country where housing supply had sharp declines included Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, Colo. (-28.8 percent); Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md. (-27.8 percent); and Cincinnati, Ohio-Ky.-Ind. (-24.4 percent).

Only two of the 50 largest metros saw inventory increase year-over-year: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis. (+9.4 percent); and San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas (+8.4 percent).

Where Prices Changed the Most
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md. (+16.0 percent); Rochester, N.Y. (+15.0 percent); and Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz. (+14.5 percent) posted the highest year-over-year median list price growth in January. Other markets across the country where housing prices shot up included Memphis, Tenn.-Miss.-Ark. (+13.7 percent); and Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, Ind. (+12.9 percent).

The steepest price declines were seen in Louisville/Jefferson County, Ky.-Ind. (-4.0 percent); Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis. (-2.0 percent); and Houston-The Woodlands-Sugarland, Texas (-1.9 percent). However, each of these markets saw yearly price declines decelerate compared to December.

Where Days on Market Changed the Most
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Conn.; Raleigh, N.C.; and Oklahoma City, Okla.; saw the largest decreases in days on market with properties spending 13, 13, and 12 fewer days on the market than last year, respectively. Other markets across the country where houses sold faster than last year included Austin-Round Rock, Texas (-9 days); Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis. (-6 days); and Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, Fla. (-6 days).

Meanwhile, properties in Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, Nev.; Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Mass.-N.H.; and Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Mich. sold 7, 7, and 6 days more slowly, respectively.

Metros Seeing the Largest Declines in Inventory

Metro Active
Listing
Count YoY
Median
Listing
Price
Median
Listing
Price YoY
Median
Days on
Market
Median Days
on Market
YoY
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif. -37.3% $1,099,500 10.1% 51 -2
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz. -35.4% $399,750 14.5% 63 0
San Diego-Carlsbad, Calif. -34.0% $734,500 11.0% 48 2
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Wash. -31.5% $599,625 6.2% 67 3
San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, Calif. -30.5% $907,500 9.7% 49 1
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, Colo. -28.8% $532,450 8.2% 63 3
Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, Calif. -28.3% $499,950 11.2% 60 -4
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md. -27.8% $289,900 16.0% 84 1
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, Va.-N.C. -26.4% $309,950 10.7% 75 1
Cincinnati, Ohio-Ky.-Ind. -24.4% $267,400 11.7% 76 2
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. -24.1% $411,500 3.4% 70 5
Providence-Warwick, R.I.-Mass. -23.2% $372,450 6.4% 74 -4
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, D.C.-Va.-Md.-W.V. -22.6% $479,900 11.0% 68 -4
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Mass.-N.H. -22.5% $589,950 10.4% 80 7
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, Ore.-Wash. -22.3% $480,748 1.3% 72 3
Rochester, N.Y. -20.8% $218,400 15.0% 67 -5
Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, Tenn. -20.7% $368,945 3.9% 49 -6
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, N.C.-S.C. -20.6% $344,495 6.0% 73 -4
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla. -20.2% $279,450 5.7% 66 -4
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Calif. -19.3% $939,500 N/A 82 N/A
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Conn. -19.1% $274,950 5.8% 82 -13
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, Md. -18.7% $315,000 5.0% 78 1
Kansas City, Mo.-Kan. -18.0% $325,000 8.7% 89 3
Birmingham-Hoover, Ala. -17.3% $252,450 12.2% 86 -9
Oklahoma City, Okla. -17.3% $259,270 10.4% 64 -12
Pittsburgh, Pa. -16.6% $189,900 11.7% 96 -8
Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, N.Y. -16.3% $197,900 10.0% 71 3
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, Fla. -15.8% $319,900 6.7% 71 -6
Austin-Round Rock, Texas -15.7% $353,293 1.6% 71 -9
Memphis, Tenn.-Miss.-Ark. -14.1% $234,183 13.7% 77 -4
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, Wis. -13.2% $287,450 5.5% 70 -4
Cleveland-Elyria, Ohio -12.5% $182,450 1.4% 82 -2
St. Louis, Mo.-Ill. -12.2% $214,450 6.7% 91 -2
New Orleans-Metairie, La. -11.9% $279,900 2.9% 86 -2
Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, Ind. -11.9% $270,993 12.9% 81 1
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, Fla. -11.2% $413,000 4.6% 90 -3
Richmond, Va. -10.9% $325,090 5.4% 70 -1
Jacksonville, Fla. -10.5% $317,495 5.3% 80 -5
Louisville/Jefferson County, Ky.-Ind. -9.6% $239,950 -4.0% 72 4
Columbus, Ohio -9.3% $284,950 12.9% 72 -2
Raleigh, N.C. -9.0% $364,166 4.1% 75 -13
New York-Newark-Jersey City, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa. -7.8% $550,000 5.8% 90 3
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Ga. -7.2% $319,950 2.3% 65 -3
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas -6.5% $339,484 0.4% 66 -4
Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, Nev. -6.2% $323,482 2.9% 66 7
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Mich. -6.0% $228,450 4.1% 70 6
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas -4.6% $304,055 -1.9% 71 -4
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Ill.-Ind.-Wis. -4.5% $302,400 1.6% 72 -1
San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas 8.4% $287,745 -0.8% 74 -3
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minn.-Wis. 9.4% $371,400 -2.0% 66 -6

usscmc

usscmc

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • How Hapag Lloyd captured a major market share in the Container Shipping Industry in USA
  • Why USA’s East Coast is the Favorite Destination for Manufacturing Companies
  • How Trade Relations Between the USA and UK Improved After Keir Starmer Became Prime Minister
  • Tips and Tricks for Procurement Managers to Handle Their Supplier Woes
  • The Crazy Supply Chain of Walmart Spanning Across the Globe

Recent Comments

  • Top 5 Supply Chain Certifications that are in high demand | Top 5 Certifications on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications
  • 3 Best Procurement Certifications that are most valuable | Procurement Newz on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications

Archives

  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019

Categories

  • Global News
  • Supply Chain Updates

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Antispam
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 www.usscmc.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us

© 2025 www.usscmc.com