Tech News, Magazine & Review WordPress Theme 2017
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Supply Chain Updates

UK Regulators Launch Discussion on Diversity and Inclusion | Latham & Watkins LLP

usscmc by usscmc
July 8, 2021
UK Regulators Launch Discussion on Diversity and Inclusion | Latham & Watkins LLP
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Discussion Paper opens debate on potential new rules to improve diversity in financial services.

On 7 July 2021, the FCA, the PRA, and the Bank of England published a joint Discussion Paper on diversity and inclusion in the financial sector. The regulators, in particular the FCA, have been focused on diversity and inclusion as regulatory issues for some time. According to the regulators, research shows there is a positive correlation between increased diversity and inclusion and better outcomes in risk management, conduct, culture, and innovation. Therefore, improving diversity and inclusion in financial services is seen as tying in closely with the regulators’ objectives. In the Discussion Paper, the regulators consider diversity and inclusion not only in terms of how a firm is run internally, but also how the firm serves its customers.

The purpose of the Discussion Paper is to explore how the regulators can accelerate the pace of meaningful change, and what role they can play in facilitating that change. These considerations are inextricably linked with other key focus areas for the regulators, including environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues and the FCA’s work on conduct and culture.

The Discussion Paper is relevant to all regulated firms and financial market infrastructures, including UK branches of overseas firms, although the regulators emphasise that any future policy will operate on a proportionate basis, taking into account firms’ structures and business models.

Background

The Discussion Paper follows the Covid-19 pandemic, which has brought more focus on the “S” element in ESG. Social risk management is seen as key for “building back better”. In terms of disclosure, “social” has long been behind the environmental and governance metrics. As racial justice, gender equality, and broader social justice issues are taking prominence in the workplace, they are becoming material issues for senior leadership teams and employees to act on and monitor.

While the financial services sector has seen various (often voluntary) initiatives in relation to diversity and inclusion, the regulators acknowledge that the pace of change has been slow. Regulatory expectations have been articulated in numerous speeches and Dear CEO letters, and some specific requirements regarding diversity have been implemented (e.g., banks must meet prescribed requirements regarding board diversity and implement a gender-neutral remuneration policy). However, these requirements typically stem from EU legislation and are sector-specific, leading to a fragmented approach and inconsistencies across different types of firms. As such, the regulators now aim to introduce concrete regulatory expectations in the area of diversity and inclusion for all firms. They want to see firms take meaningful steps to achieve greater representation at all levels, but particularly at the board and senior management levels. While there has been a strong focus on gender to date, the regulators want to make sure that firms also pay due regard to other diversity characteristics, such as socio-economic background, with a primary purpose of encouraging and bringing about diversity of thought. The more perspectives that are brought to bear on a key decision, the greater the likelihood of an optimal course being adopted.

The regulators consider that diversity and inclusion are key to a healthy culture. Greater diversity should support having a wide range of views across an organisation, while inclusion should create the necessary environment for individuals to be able to express these views, speak up, and raise concerns.

Potential Proposals

The regulators outline what future policy measures they might introduce. These include measures for firms to consider internally, such as expectations regarding governance, senior management, remuneration, and policies and procedures. They also include considerations for the regulators to incorporate into their supervisory approach, including how issues relating to diversity and inclusion could affect the suitability (“fitness and propriety”) of individuals and firms for regulatory approval.

Tone From the Top

The regulators see boards and senior management as key to the success of any future requirements. Specific regulatory expectations may include:

  • Requiring the board to set the firm’s diversity and inclusion strategy and policy, and oversee its progress
  • Expecting the board to monitor and challenge progress on diversity and inclusion, including holding management to account
  • Introducing specific targets for board representation
  • Requiring the firm to think about diverse representation when carrying out succession planning
  • Ensuring accountability for diversity and inclusion through the Senior Managers and Certification Regime
  • Expecting the firm to use metrics linked to advancing diversity and inclusion as part of non‑financial criteria when setting variable remuneration awards
  • Expecting the firm’s remuneration policy to ensure that all types of remuneration, both fixed and variable, do not give rise to discriminatory practices

Policies and Practices

The regulators are considering the following measures:

  • Requiring firms to have a diversity and inclusion policy and publish it on their website (although the content of such policies would not be prescribed)
  • Expecting firms to think more about the progression of their employees as part of recruitment, promotion, and succession planning
  • Potentially expecting firms to set targets for representation and inclusion within boards, senior management populations, customer-facing roles, and/or the wider firm
  • Expecting firms to offer training on diversity and inclusion
  • Developing expectations on product governance that specifically take into account consumers’ protected characteristics or other diversity characteristics
  • Requiring firms to publicly disclose a selection of aggregated diversity data on their senior management population and employee population as a whole, as well as their diversity and inclusion policies
  • Expecting firms to consider carrying out internal diversity audits

Regulatory Measures

The regulators are considering how they will underscore the importance of diversity and inclusion in their supervision of firms and individuals:

  • Individuals: The regulators are exploring whether adverse findings in relation to individuals’ conduct with respect to diversity and inclusion issues could affect fit and proper assessments. The regulators are also considering whether to develop guidance on this topic to include evidence of sexual harassment, bullying, and discrimination on the basis of someone’s protected characteristics as factors to take into account when considering non-financial misconduct. Because firms would be expected to assess whether evidence of such behaviour constitutes a breach of the FCA’s Conduct Rules, the regulators consider that it may be helpful to develop guidance on how such behaviour, or failure to take reasonable steps to address this kind of behaviour, could result in a breach of the Conduct Rules.
  • Senior Managers: The regulators wish to increase their scrutiny of firms’ senior management diversity. They are considering whether to collect diversity data about individual senior managers as part of the information provided for Senior Management Function applications. Where the regulators have concerns that a proposed appointment would worsen or not address risks arising from a lack of diversity, they might consider whether these concerns could provide grounds for withholding approval.
  • Firms: The regulators may develop guidance on how they could take into account a firm’s record on diversity and inclusion in assessing whether the firm meets the Threshold Conditions.

More generally, the regulators suggest that firms should expect to find supervisors asking more questions about how they are embedding diversity across their business and creating a culture of inclusion. Firms should also expect diversity and inclusion to be a regular part of the regulators’ engagement with senior management and the board going forwards.

Data Collection and Reporting

The regulators note that firms are not currently subject to any reporting requirements that give the regulators an insight into the diversity of the financial services sector. Consequently, the regulators are considering introducing regular reporting of employee data — most likely data on the protected characteristics and socio-economic backgrounds of different categories of staff. Any future proposal for a regular data collection would most likely involve firms approaching staff to complete a questionnaire; therefore firms would need to consider how to lawfully collect, store, and share this data. The regulators would use the data both to inform future policy-making and to monitor and measure outcomes (and potentially hold firms to account).

The regulators plan to issue a voluntary pilot data survey in the autumn to help inform any future policy. The regulators expect that the data will assist with developing their general policy proposals around diversity, and also their specific proposals concerning reporting by firms, as it will allow them to assess what data firms have available.

A potential expectation would be for firms to develop metrics that enable monitoring of their diversity and inclusion initiatives. The regulators are also interested in views on the data that firms are using, or could use, to ensure that their products and services meet consumers’ needs.

Next Steps

Comments are requested by 30 September 2021. The regulators plan to publish a Consultation Paper at the beginning of 2022, which will set out proposed rules and guidance. They plan to follow this with final rules in Q3 2022. The FCA is also considering its approach to diversity in listed firms (in particular whether board diversity should be mandated), and plans to share more on its thinking on this topic in the coming months.

usscmc

usscmc

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • How Hapag Lloyd captured a major market share in the Container Shipping Industry in USA
  • Why USA’s East Coast is the Favorite Destination for Manufacturing Companies
  • How Trade Relations Between the USA and UK Improved After Keir Starmer Became Prime Minister
  • Tips and Tricks for Procurement Managers to Handle Their Supplier Woes
  • The Crazy Supply Chain of Walmart Spanning Across the Globe

Recent Comments

  • Top 5 Supply Chain Certifications that are in high demand | Top 5 Certifications on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications
  • 3 Best Procurement Certifications that are most valuable | Procurement Newz on Top 5 Globally Recognized Supply Chain Certifications

Archives

  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019

Categories

  • Global News
  • Supply Chain Updates

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Antispam
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 www.usscmc.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Supply Chain Updates
  • Global News
  • Contact Us

© 2025 www.usscmc.com